Current Visitors:      Total Products:

The Ultimate Goal of Life™ - Sacred Genetic Code Theory: Scientific and Logical Evidence. Samer Kurait. Publisher: U UNIQUE, April 12, 2009.

Payment for the Book is by Donation only starting from US$0.00. Please, note that no payment is required or necessary except only if you insist to donate.

To get the book, please go thru the regular purchase and checkout process even at US$0.00 payment ). Please, note that no payment is required or necessary except only if you insist to donate). After completing the final check out steps, we will email you your book copy without about 24 hours. Once you receive the book, then you may need to install the free third party DNL Reader to view the 3-D book format. You can click here to download the DNL Reader  

I came to this theory while I was trying to answer a burning question I had, “What is the Ultimate Goal of Life™”? I concluded that the moment our Genetic Code forms, we are given the incredible opportunity to abide by the Creator’s design so that we can either win or lose life with the Creator after living ceased. The Creator’s design is closely linked to our sexuality as sexuality gives and receives life and the opportunity that never existed before. But the goal of life is not the sexual relationship or achievements during life, but winning life with the Creator after death. I wrote The Ultimate Goal of Life™ to describe the scientific evidence, clues, and logic that led to my thesis that sexuality is designed by its original Creator to be forever limited to the union between a virgin woman and a man that never had a relation with a virgin woman who is still alive.

The first reviewers of my book asked questions that were mainly Biblical or Christian in nature thus, I wrote The Ultimate Good and Bad™ showing additional support for what I called Sacred Genetic Code™ Theory. I found in logic, science and the Bible clear evidence supporting my theory that the first sexual encounter between a virgin woman and a man that never had a relation with a virgin woman who is still alive permanently physically alters a segment of their Genetic Code so that they are destined to be partners for life. In this article, I will briefly describe my theory, the evidence that supports it, and the implications of my theory for society.

Sacred Genetic Code™ Theory describes my conclusion that a portion of our Genetic Code carries information about our sexuality. I believe a segment of the Genetic Code identifies our sexuality; I call it the Chaste Genetic Code™. I concluded that the first sexual activity between a virgin woman and a man that never had a relation with a virgin woman must alter the Chaste Genetic Code™ to a new permanent state I call Spousal Genetic Code™. Part of our genetic code also carries a protective defense I call Anti-Rejection Defense™ (see below). Any subsequent sexual relationship with new partners must overcome the Anti-Rejection Defense™. In doing so, the new sexual relationship creates profound negative consequences similar to organ transplant rejection. The negative consequences can be immediate or delayed; they can be physical, psychological or hormonal.

Anti-Rejection Defense™ works similarly to the body’s immune system. When the body is exposed to viruses or vaccinations, it remembers for life that specific virus and creates defenses against it. I believe that the Anti-Rejection Defense™ works similarly, but is specifically related to the sexual system. A man secretes millions of sperm, even though one sperm is all that is needed to alter the woman’s egg to create the Genetic Code makeup of an entire human being. Therefore, it should be expected that the man’s millions of sperm and the woman’s fluids and blood components would be exchanged across their sensitive membranes and must trigger reactions in their bodies somehow similar to the body’s immune response or reaction to a donor organ, but mainly affecting their sexual system and its related Genetic Code.

I concluded that successful numbing of the Anti-Rejection Defense™ creates sexual addiction. I believe that sexual addiction becomes the worst type of addiction creating fantasies that generate fixed sexual imageries that with time require new players to better fulfill the fantasy. Consequently, sexual addiction seeks fulfillment regardless of the prey's age, gender, marital status, or health. Those who manipulate civil law or use twisted moral interpretations or "pseudo" science, will always seek to fulfill their sexual addiction within the boundaries of accepted and protected "legal rape." Other sexual addicts will seek fulfillment of their addiction by illegal rapes, human trafficking and pedophilia. Therefore, overcoming the sexual addiction becomes a lifelong challenge. If someone reaches death while in the state of sexual addiction, the opportunity to win life with the Creator after death is jeopardized.

Some people have argued that multiple sexual partners are the natural result of a world population that is predominantly female. They claim that because we have an excess supply of women, men dominate the polygamy market just as one rooster is needed for multiple number of chickens. They rationalize that there are millions more females than males in the U.S.A. and Russia and these "extra females" would happily accept an unfaithful relationship rather than staying chaste. I find no evidence to support this argument. According to the United Nations' statistics on the world population for 2008, about 3,360,742,758 males are on the planet and about 3,310,483,706 females. This makes about 50.3% males than females and not the other way around. I find it illogical to claim that polygamy and concubines represent natural human practices supported by presence of more women in the world.

If every man wants one spouse and one sexual partner at the same time, we would finish with half the men in the world having no wives, which means about 1.6 billion men would lose the opportunity to marry. Of course, many men choose the opportunity to stay chaste and unmarried all their lives; but that most likely would about equal the number of women in the world who choose to stay chaste.

I believe sexual freedom that attempts to rationalize polygamy or promiscuity forces the remaining men without an equal share of women to act by instinct - to murder the fewer men who had wives and take over the precious limited supply of women. Parents would teach their children to do the same, and the practice would deplete the human race. Anyone who wants to engage in polygamy or sexual freedom (promiscuity) must reach out not only to single people, but also to married and committed ones.

Although civil law and social norms protect sexual promiscuity and infidelity, their negative lifelong effect is overwhelming. I concluded that promiscuity, affairs and infidelity, although legal, represent lethal rape against the innocent current or future partner and children.

ISBN 978-0-9821669-1-8. Library of Congress Control Number: 2009924568

The question remains, which partner would have the specific section of the Genetic Code alteration first and then would trigger the alteration of the specific section of the Genetic Code of the other partner? I believe that first the woman's specific section of her Genetic Code becomes altered since her body is designed to receive and absorb larger amounts of the man's fluids. Furthermore, breaking of her virginity membrane is the triggering factor to activate the specific Genetic Code alteration of her body and the man's body. Additionally, the woman's body is suited to host and develop the new altered and separate Genetic Code of the offspring. Therefore, only after the woman's specific section of her Genetic Code becomes altered, I believe that her body would communicate the required message to alter the man's specific element of his Genetic Code.

I believe both stages of the specific area of the Genetic Code alteration either occur or not during the first relationship and take effect fairly quickly during the first mating. This order of events is a two-stage process; the first stage is required before influencing the second. In other words, if the woman was not a virgin, then her specific Genetic Code is already altered by elements specific to a previous man. Therefore, the subsequent men's bodies become unreceptive to the foreign message of a non-virgin woman and their special section of the Genetic Code would not alter even if the man never had a prior relation with a virgin woman. Furthermore, if the woman was virgin and the man had a previous sexual relationship with a virgin woman, then his specific element of the Genetic Code is already altered and immune from receiving the new woman's Genetic Code message. Unfortunately, the woman, although she lost her virginity to a man who had his specific Genetic Code altered by a previous virgin woman, can no longer alter hers or another man's specific Genetic Code sections. In other words, the man is continuously and permanently married to the first virgin woman he mates. Additionally, a virgin woman is continuously and permanently married to the first man who never had a sexual relationship with a previous virgin woman.

The legitimate wife permanently and continuously has her legitimate husband’s gift of himself for her alone in exchange of herself, carried within her Genetic Code that has been permanently altered. Likewise, the legitimate husband permanently and continuously has his legitimate wife’s gift of herself for himself alone in exchange of himself, carried within her Genetic Code that has been permanently altered. Consequently, any and every relationship thereafter outside the two legitimate permanent living spouses is a gross abusive and unjust sin that abuses what a person entrusted with foreigners who also abuse what they had been entrusted by their legitimate spouses. The sin is absolutely ugly and that is why the Creator named such relationships the sin of adultery.

The Importance of the Virginity Membrane

If the woman's virginity membrane were unnecessary or not vital, the Creator would never have created it in the first place. Those who believe in theories that we are naturally promiscuous could argue that the virginity membrane is unessential to promiscuous relationships. But if that were the case, according to their own evolution theory, it should have disappeared by now. In other words, the same theory that accounts for the idea that sexual evolution encourages promiscuity and that humans evolved from apes, should have eliminated the virginity membrane.

Additionally, those who twist the Bible and propose that promiscuity, divorce and adultery are acceptable, should find the virginity membrane is a faulty design. Because, a virgin woman can gift her virginity membrane only once and only to one man and only during the initial mating in her life. Since a virgin woman can give her virgin membrane to one man alone, adultery or fornication are a sin. In other words, it is like the Creator designed the woman with feelings and desires that may lead her to promiscuity and trap her into committing the sin of fornication and adultery; it is like a death sentence carried on her head from birth. The virginity membrane causes trouble for its owner if she does not obey and abide the designer's law about its proper use to fulfill its function. Therefore, it would be better not to have the virginity membrane and all her future partners may never know if she had other partners or not; that would relieve the woman and her first man from condemnation. Besides, the virginity membrane has nothing to do with procreating children, yet it is broken in an act that can cause procreation and it is located in the way to procreate. So, apparently it is needed to procreate something else. My conclusion in The Sacred Genetic Code™ theory is that this membrane must be needed also to procreate her and the man's segment of the Genetic Code based on the Genetic Codes needed from the man who has not had a previous sexual relationship with a virgin woman.

The virgin woman can only give her virginity to one man in all the world and can only give it permanently. Once it is given, it cannot be taken back; it is a lifelong gift. That once in a lifetime gift is made of flesh and blood and Genetic Code. A permanent gift of self-offering exchanges herself for a receiver who is free to exchange himself. As I pointed out about Adam and Eve in The Ultimate Good and Bad™, the receiver of that gift must offer at least an equal gift to the giver, just as Adam and Eve offered to die abiding by the Creator's design for permanent marriage. Likewise, I concluded the Creator was forced to offer himself by dying for them and not by sacrificing anyone else or giving other compensations such as money, wealth, or any materialistic or empty promises. Similarly, the man who received the woman's virginity can offer back only his own body for her to take. A gift permanently given or received cannot be taken back until death. In addition, each one of the legitimate spouses permanently carries within their Genetic Code the other spouse's appropriate section of the Genetic Code. Therefore, neither of the legitimate spouses has any of their own self available to offer to any outsiders, no matter whether the spouses separate, divorce or come to love other people and hate each other.

Summary

In summary, I find that the order of the gift exchange is that the woman gives the gift first; then the man who is suitable to receive the gift (meaning still has a gift to give) gives his available gift to her in exchange. Therefore, a man or a woman who already gave their one gift to someone alive cannot take back their gift to give it to someone else during any new sexual relationship. A man or woman who have no gift of oneself left to share cannot share themselves and their gifts with others outside the partner who owns his/or her permanent gift. They can only share sexuality, sensuality, and addiction. In other words, every and any sexual relationship outside the legitimate permanent partner pollutes not only the promiscuous, but also pollutes the honor and the trusted most precious gift of the original partner with contamination of outsiders. If the relationship between a virgin woman and man is limited to an exchange of rings, property or materials, then breaking the relationship at any time could be accomplished by returning everything exchanged and neither would lose anything since each one can still use his/or her original material possessions. Likewise, adultery would not be a problem since any time both can return the exchanged items.

Therefore, a legitimate spouse having sexual relations with an outside partner, even with legal permission (legal divorce), includes their legitimate spouse in the sexual act with the new partners. In other words, an illegitimate wife (whether divorced, legally separated or legally married to another divorced man) is gifting her legitimate spouse’s which she has no right to gift to others. Hence Christ explained in the harshest most commanding words, "Whoever divorces his spouse and marries another commits adultery against her; and if she divorces her husband and marries another, she commits adultery (Mark 10: 2-12)." These words of Christ are amazing. Although the person is divorced and supposedly free to remarry, yet a new marriage is an adultery against the other living spouse and the new marriage is illegitimate even if it is legal. Therefore, betrayal is extremely painful and lasts a lifetime, because the trusted person shares with others not what he/or she owns, but what he/or she was permanently given and entrusted by their legitimate lifelong spouse. Therefore, a virgin woman who gave her virginity to her spouse can only share herself once in her lifetime.

Likewise, the man who never shared himself with a virgin woman can exchange himself for her virginity in a permanent gift. The non-virgin wife can never be able to gift herself to anyone else, because she no longer has her virginity to offer. Therefore, your treasure is worthier than large amount of money and diamonds; you would never wear them exposed in a crowded mall or let anyone know where you hide them. Your treasure exchanged with your legitimate and permanent spouse is a treasure made by the Creator to be worthier than anything else. People who carry just a little money or gold would hide them and protect their little materialistic treasure in a crowded mall in fear of pocket-pickers. Yet, amazingly the adulteress and adulterer easily expose their most worthy and irreplaceable treasures to outsiders to touch, fondle, and admire. They flirt, expose, soil, break and humiliate their treasures in exchange for something they see, hear, hunger, fantasize and perceive to be worthier. The lifelong damage inflicted by the adulterer and adulteress is immeasurable by the treasures of the entire world.

John the Baptist preached the truth about Christ and about the sin of adultery without fear to the point that he was beheaded. King Herod took his brother's wife when his brother Philip was alive. This is adultery. If remarriage for legitimate spouses is possible as the people desire and the Court declares, then truly there is no need for Christ, the entire Bible, the Ten Commandments, logic and society throughout history to describe adultery as harsher than all sins; there is no need at certain times to punish the perpetrators by death. All spouses would need to do is to separate and remarry their lovers and thereby avoid the deadly crime of adultery permanently. Furthermore, if remarriage is permissible, then the adulteress can redeem her adultery easily by divorce and remarriage of her adulterer lover. If that were the case, adultery would not have been described, talked about, discussed and argued in the Bible and in every society.

In fact, legitimate spouses are inseparable by any means no matter how much lawyers argue it in courts. Courts encourage and enforce divorce rather than the marital vow, because divorce offers the tyranny of businesses and political profiteering. Financial gain by itself is never a legitimate or acceptable rationalization for dissolving a marital vow. Therefore, any and every outside relationship is the most serious ongoing adultery unless completely stopped and repented; the remorseful must commit to remain faithful, not to the adulterer or adulteress, but to the Creator's design and the legitimate spouse either together or in permanent chastity.

Note that if a virgin man or a virgin woman has relations with partners who are not virgins, it does not go without a high risk and penalty. It does not matter if the sexual relationship is limited to using protection, did not result in pregnancy or unnatural intercourse. Because, there are emotional, hormonal, fantasy and other areas that are also triggered and affected by every sexual act with every partner and these create addiction, which is too difficult to overcome. Illegitimate sexual relationships expose us to diseases known, unknown, discovered, not discovered either instantly or over the long term. There are always side effects to every action and this is especially true in the area of sexuality. Overcoming any such problem takes sincere confession, admitting faults, avoiding deception, avoiding delaying; at the earliest opportunity, repairing the damages to those caused the hurt, betrayal and deception. The fantasy and the damages would always remain. The pain one causes would always remain.

Therefore, sexuality is not a toy to experiment with or to use for fun, to get materialistic empty treasures, feel happy, ride in a nice car, get a nice home or date someone that owns a house with a swimming pool. Do not lower the gift you shared with someone or someone shared with you to betray them for things or feelings. You are much worthier than all materialistic possessions or pleasure or power of the world. Marriage is not about feelings and materialistic things; marriage is about suffering and commitment to suffer together to honor, nourish and care for the gift of self that was permanently exchanged. This together means it can never become equal or legitimate to suffer with anyone you like - only the one with whom you exchanged a permanent gift of self. No matter how valid the excuse, no matter how believable the deception appears, no matter how many court legal papers one has, no matter how many materialistic possessions you gained or exchanged the truth for, it would never change the truth.

Confession and Forgiveness

Promiscuity and especially adultery blinds the perpetrators to the point they convince themselves and others that they have done no wrong; they make thousands of excuses as  illustrated in Proverbs 30:20, "Such is the way of an adulterous woman: she eats, wipes her mouth, and says, 'I have done no wrong.'" Adultery is a foxy thief who hungers to become a millionaire and so steals millions in gold. However, the clever thief runs crying to the Creator confessing the robbery and asks forgiveness. Certainly, the Creator forgives transgression no matter how gross and offensive. Afterward, the repentant thief, filled with joy and a clear conscious, rushes to begin his wealthy life with all the treasures he ever desired and stole. He believes that his confession converted the stolen treasure to his/or her legitimate possessions. The adulterer or adulteress desires to return to the illegitimate adulterous relationship, believing that the living adultery and the adulterous partner miraculously become legitimate. Miraculously his/or her previous legitimate spouse becomes illegitimate until he/or she tires of them and moves to another relationship. Adultery is a foxy person who enjoys the fun of his/or her adulterous relationship with the devil. Finally, the person realizes the need for repentance and willingly and remorsefully prays to the Creator to forgive his/or her sins of the adulterous companionship with the devil. The person feels happy for his/or her courage to confess the adulterous relationship with the devil and returns to living joyfully with the devil, believing that his/or her confession miraculously converted the devil into an angel. If that is even possible, all the devils should have been converted to angels a long time ago. Therefore, adultery must be declared the miracle salvation for the conversion and elimination of the entire world of devils.

You say that life is too short to waste it by not pursuing your dreams and desires and your motto is to always start anew. It is true that life is short, but the purpose of life is not to do anything you feel or like, but to do what is right and to abide by the Creator's design. While it is true that you can always start anew, you must start anew on the right path and not start anew on a wrong, adulterous or promiscuous path. Your relationship with a new partner is not right no matter how new it is or how happy you feel or how many materialistic possessions you gain.

Life is too short to seek materialistic and false happiness. I challenge you -- can you take a tinny materialistic possession or a party or your pleasurable feelings with you when you die? You will end up presenting your life, whether you abided or failed to abide by the Creator's design, as a gift to the Creator. The Creator does not need your materialistic possessions as a gift. The Creator needs yourself and your faithfulness and trustworthiness to the lifetime-trusted gift of self of the legitimate spouse you vowed verbally and non-verbally to honor, commit to and be faithful to. No, not any sexual relation with any partner is a gift, or you would end up with many. It is only the once in a lifetime permanent exchange of the only gift one has with the only gift another has that make the two permanent legitimate spouses.

If you cannot be entrusted to honor the one gift you received and gave yourself for, then do you believe multiple people’s who find you polluting the gift your legitimate spouse entrusted you that those people can trust you? A consummated union between a virgin woman and a man that never had a relation with a virgin woman cannot be dissolved because one partner wants to control the other or has an opposing wish.  Neither partner can dissolve the union because no human being designed our human body the way it is. Likewise, a child is denied his/or her wish to replace his inherited height from a parent with the genes of a preferred height. Even with all the advanced technology, an attempt to change the child’s height does not come without continuous lifelong negative and risky side effects. The reason is not that we are mean, controlling, or denying other people's wishes, freedom and desires; rather the reason is because no human designed our bodies. Therefore, in The Ultimate Goal of Life™ I concluded that to abide by the Creator's design means to care either for yourself living chaste as the Creator designed you, or living faithfully caring for the gift of your legitimate spouse that you replaced yourself for until death. The gift of yourself or your legitimate partner is non-returnable and permanent whether you know it, like it, hate it or change your mind.

Widows and Widowers

There remains the question of the widow and widower. In this case, it maybe not a Genetic Code alteration issue. From a moral, just and humanitarian point of view it is permissible to remarry, but I insist the remarriage must be to a legitimate person who does not have a living spouse. I would maintain that a marriage of a widow or widower still must comply with the Creator's design, which means the spouse is either a widow/ or widower or a virgin woman or a man that has not previously had a sexual relationship with a virgin woman. A dead spouse does not need the gift that was entrusted from the legitimate spouse and so the gift is returned to the donor spouse. A dead person cannot take care of the gift of the living spouse's self, hence Christ said in heaven we neither marry nor are given in marriage. The dead spouse has no need for the gift and because of its utmost value (since it is made of a spouse), the gift is returned back to the donor spouse. In other words, a virgin woman gives her body to the man and does not have any more gift to give out to any other man. If the man has never exchanged his body for another suitable living person, he can reciprocate and gift his body to the woman. Therefore, the man’s body is no longer his and the woman’s body is no longer hers alone. No one can take back a gift that is given. No one can give another a gift that was already given to someone else who is alive.

I point out that the marriage of a widow or widower, even though it is permissible, truly cannot equal the marriage of a virgin woman and a qualified man since even though the husband is dead, she cannot recover her lost virginity. In comparison, a marriage or a relationship of a legitimate spouse with an outside partner while her/or his spouse is alive truly violates even humanitarian reasoning in spite of all court legalizations. Therefore, sexual relations outside of the legitimate union are thievery that pollutes what one does not own. It triggers so much pain and severe consequences that we call it adultery and we condemn it now and in the future as deceitful.

In The Ultimate Good and Bad™, I find that adultery is not only forbidden by one of the Ten Commandments, but it violates every one of them directly and indirectly. Marriage or adultery is not a single event, but a continual state. I find that divorce in itself (unless the marriage is illegitimate from the start), when properly examined is nothing other than a celebration to the cheerful divorced spouse for getting a certificate of adultery. It represents enslavement of the family and children. Furthermore, remarriage while a legitimate spouse is alive is nothing other than a celebration to the cheerful remarried couple for getting a certificate of legitimate adultery.

A Standard for Behavior

Finally, I would urge every person to set the standard high for his or her potential partner. Selecting just anyone as a partner not only damages oneself, but damages everyone else by encouraging and promoting promiscuous people to market themselves like parasites that offer honey to lure and infest the population. Furthermore, before getting into a relationship or marriage or divorce or remarriage, or even before dating, examine yourself to determine whether you are legitimately free to marry. Then examine any potential relationship or partner-to-be before you even attempt to build a relationship; determine whether they are free to marry or already have a legitimate spouse. Do not let divorces, separation, annulments, or breakups, lure you into thinking that either of you is available and free to entertain the possibility of a relationship. If you do not qualify, then be honest with yourself, your legitimate permanent spouse and the mighty Creator and choose to remain permanently chaste and close all possible doors. Or if the possibility exists, choose to reunite with your permanent legitimate spouse. Remember that our gift of self is not by words, or empty promises, or a signature on a contract, or name change, or exchange of materialistic possessions; rather it is a permanent exchange of oneself for another without the possibility of taking it back.

On the other hand, if you are a virgin woman or a man who never had a relationship with a virgin woman and believe that you are free to offer your gift of self permanently to another person, you must carefully prequalify the candidate. The prequalifying of the candidate is not based on looks, finances, or education, but the prequalification is based on their being free of any legitimate living spouse and on their ability to share similar faith and understanding of the nature of the unbreakable marital vow. Ask about their families and investigate repeatedly to make sure they are the most suitable, honorable and respectable of the gift of yourself that they would receive and their gift of themselves they would give.

Notice how promiscuous people do not appreciate the nature of the gift they received. Likewise, they don’t understand that they cannot ever qualify for another equal gift at least as long as the legitimate spouse lives and until they are free from their promiscuous addiction (which is so difficult to overcome that may take a lifetime). If you are in a relationship, please avoid any promiscuity, deception, or attempt to divorce. The spouse you are with may be your permanent legitimate spouse. Avoid rushing into divorce and false accusations; don’t give up easily; avoid selfishness; don’t entice others or let others entice you to do something you would regret that could hurt many people in the future. It is not during the separation or after the divorce that you should examine whether the divorce was legitimate; you should examine the situation before you even attempt that route. Finally, for the sake of peace and justice, if you have children and want to divorce, do not deceive your spouse and do not trust the legal court or lawyers to help you for the best of your children's interest. Try with your permanent spouse to work out everything possible before ever setting a foot in a Court. In addition, if you both do not qualify to marry someone else, try to live separately. Avoiding exposing your children to the Court so you can raise them properly.

The Ultimate Good and Bad™ - Sacred Genetic Code™ Theory. Judeo-Christian Biblical Evidence. Samer Kurait. Publisher: U UNIQUE™, July 12, 2009.

Payment for the Book is by Donation only starting from US$0.00. Please, note that no payment is required or necessary except only if you insist to donate.

To get the book, please go thru the regular purchase and checkout process even at US$0.00 payment )Please, note that no payment is required or necessary except only if you insist to donate). After completing the final check out steps, we will email you your book copy without about 24 hours. Once you receive the book, then you may need to install the free third party DNL Reader to view the 3-D book format. You can click here to download the DNL Reader

I have found other resources that are teaching the same principal I developed in the two books. The resources discuss clear Biblical foundations about the permanence of marriage and against remarriage, unless remarriage was due to a grievous stain from the beginning (very limited situations not based on arguments, likes and dislikes, but based on something that stains the marital vow). There is no excuse and no forgiveness for those who continue in the state of adultery. I have found such understanding in Catholic, Protestant, and any logical honest work that seeks truth. Promiscuity causes diseases, fatherless children, out of wedlock children (pregnancy before marriage or in an invalid marriages or relationships), troubled children from single-family homes, and much more. The undisputed damages of promiscuity affirm that even non-religious rational and logical honest thinkers would agree against remarriages and absolute divorce for the good and wellbeing of the human race, the right of the children and the nature of the promise of marital vow. These sources use a different approach, but all agree on the conclusion. The truth is timeless. It is just up to the person to excuse, rationalize, reject, deny, falsify or accept. One cannot deceive the Creator, nor Satan, but only oneself.

·         A great Catholic discussions with all the Saints and various Popes through out history against absolute dissolution of the marriage bond. However, the main idea should tell us that Catholic teaching is against any form of remarriages, except for limited cases that invalidate the marriage bond before it took place. The source discusses limited divorce or separation from bed and board is allowed for various reasons, but not the remarriage. Some of the early church father's quotes are: "We read in Hermas (about the year 150), "Pastor", mand. IV, I, 6: "Let him put her (the adulterous wife) away and let the husband abide alone; but if after putting away his wife he shall marry another, he likewise committeth adultery (ed. Funk, 1901). The expression in verse 8, "For the sake of her repentance, therefore, the husband ought not to marry", does not weaken the absolute command, but it gives the supposed reason of this great command. St. Justine Martyr (d. 176) says (Apolog., I, xv, P.G., VI, 349), plainly and without exception: "He that marrieth her that has been put away by another man committeth adultery." In like manner Athenagoras (about 177) in his Plea for the Christians 33: "For whosoever shall put away his wife and shall marry another, committed adultery"; Tertullian (d. 247), "De monogamiâ", c, ix (P.L., II, 991): "They enter into adulterous unions even when they do not put away their wives, we are not allowed to even marry although we put our wives away"; Clement of Alexandria (d. 217) (Stromata II.23) mentions the ordinance of Holy Scripture in the following words; "You shall not put away your wife except for fornication, and [Holy Scripture] considers as adultery a remarriage while the other of the separated persons survives." Similar expressions are found in the course of the following centuries both in the Latin and in the Greek Fathers, e.g. St. Basil of Cæsarea, "Epist. can.", ii, "Ad Amphilochium", can. xlviii (P.G., XXXII, 732); St. John Chrysostom, "De libello repud." (P.G., LI, 218); Theodoretus, on I Cor., vii, 39, 40 (P.G., LXXXII, 275); St. Ambrose, "in Luc.", VIII, v, 18 sqq. (P.L., XV, 1855); St. Jerome, Epist. lx (ad Amand.), n. 3 (P.L., XXII, 562); St. Augustine, "De adulterinis conjugiis", II, iv (P.L., XL, 473), etc., etc. The occurrences of passages in some Fathers, even among those just quoted, which treat the husband more mildly in case of adultery, or seem to allow him a new marriage after the infidelity of his spouse, does not prove that these expressions are to be understood of the permissibility of a new marriage, but of the lesser canonical penance and of exemption from punishment by civil law." Also notice the following powerful affirmative on the indissolubility of the marriage bond that affirmed during the council of Trint as an article of faith, "Dogmatic Decision on the Indissolubility of Marriage — The Council of Trent was the first to make a dogmatic decision on this question. This took place in Session XXIV, canon v: "If anyone shall say that the bond of matrimony can be dissolved for the cause of heresy, or of injury due to cohabitation, or of wilful desertion; let him be anathema", and in canon vii: "If anyone shall say that the Church has erred in having taught, and in teaching that, according to the teaching of the Gospel and the Apostles, the bond of matrimony cannot be dissolved, and that neither party — not even the innocent, who has given no cause by adultery — can contract another marriage while the other lives, and that he, or she, commits adultery who puts away an adulterous wife, or husband, and marries another; let him be anathema." Furthermore, this is vital to the faith was demanded to be included in the profession of faith by the separated oriental churches when reunited to the Roman Catholic Church in the year 1890. Source: Lehmkuhl, A. (1909). Divorce (in Moral Theology). In The Catholic Encyclopedia. New York: Robert Appleton Company. http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/05054c.htm  

I would mention that annulment by the Catholic Church evaluate the provided information presented by the two spouses, few witnesses or in some cases by only one spouse. Those seeking annulment or as a matter of facts any divorce have interest to remarry and possibly the presented case is twisted and stretched to fit their goal of the divorce. Therefore, the Catholic Church may declare the marriage null, but limited based on the presented information. However, if the presented information is stretched or has personal prejudice then the nullity decree clearly declared null of a different union. We can see that in civil courts that after many years of imprisoning someone based on presented information, later time the court decision would be reversed based on truthful evidence. Therefore, that must be kept in mind.

• virginity may exist in a women even after bodily violation committed upon her against her will. Virginity is irreparably lost by sexual pleasure, voluntarily and completely experienced. "I tell you without hesitation", writes St. Jerome in his twenty-second Epistle to St. Eustochium, n. 5 (P.L., XXII, 397) "that though God is almighty, He cannot restore a virginity that has been lost." A failure in the resolution, or even incomplete faults, leave room for efficacious repentance, which restores virtue and the right to the aureola. Vermeersch, A. (1912). Virginity. In The Catholic Encyclopedia. New York: Robert Appleton Company. Retrieved October 23, 2010 from New Advent: http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/15458a.htm

  I would mention that virginity exists only once and likewise a union between a virgin woman and a man that never had a union with a virgin woman is likewise irreversible meaning indissoluble union. Christ stated it in the strongest words, "Therefore, what God has joined together, no human being must separate" (Mark 10: 9). Such strong and absolute words are clear to me that the nature of the inseparable joining together is on the Genetic Code materials of flesh, bones and blood.

·          Dr Stephan Baskerville book: Taken into Custody is a great scholar book for every person. He uses over 975 references outlining the false brainwashing techniques for a main purpose of gaining finance and enslavement of human by a tyranny of political, law and business beneficiaries that pollute people to break their marriages and damage their children. He shows how the innocent spouse is punished and the guilty spouse in divorce is rewarded so ultimately the Tyranny would benefit. It is powerful logical account of the harm of divorce and adultery on families and children. This is a scholar and objectively well researched and documented logical proof against divorce, especially unilateral divorce and its unrecoverable damages. Dr. Stephan Baskerville researched the damages and imprisonment of the children by the state bringing strangers to decide the family fate. The book would discourage a logical spouse whose faithful to the marital covenant and love for her/ or his children truly above personal greed and control never to take a spouse to any legal court or a false abuse claim or adultery which leads to courts. In other words, I found the book would help a logical person to conclude that marriage is intended to be indissoluble until death. In family courts, the family secrets are exposed publically for strangers interested and profiting in harming families and children.

·         An excellent article by a protestant Bishop Arne Rudvin from the Norway. He outlines a need to ban on remarriage. He discusses the Protestant erroneous permission of remarriage. He point that the Bible is so clear that whoever divorced to live without remarriage and without sex as long as their spouse is alive or be reunite to the spouse. He points that if the remarriage is considered valid or rationalized for the sake of the children or we cannot be that hard or there is forgiveness, then it is polygamy and polyandry. However, he points that Jesus called it adultery. He points forgiveness does not erase or validate a remarriage. The sin is not the one time event of remarriage, but adultery, which is a continuation of the sin. Additionally, he adds that, "He who knowingly and willingly continues to live in a sinful relationship is not forgiven." He point that a consummated marriage between Christians or non-Christians is just as binding. The bishop points that even the innocent spouse of a spouse-committed adultery is not free to remarry. He points that the entire defense of remarriage permission to the innocence spouse only is based on wrong interpretation of one exception that Christ used in Mathew 19:9 the word "porneia" which is a different word than he previously used. Luther points that the law is to kill the guilty spouse and the innocent widow can legally remarry. However, since the government does not fulfill its obligation and kill the guilty spouse of adultery that spouse is already dead in the eyes of God and the innocent spouse maybe considered a widow (or widower) who then can remarry. However, the bishop points that this word "porniea" means "prohibited marriage." The Bishop traces the context and the Jewish tradition to point that Jews would marry a virgin on Wednesday, because the local tribunal was in session on Thursday. Thus, the groom could bring his complaint if it turned out that the bride was not a virgin and the marriage would be annulled without divorce. The Bishop indicates that Christ exception to "porniea" if the marriage was based on deceit or fraud as in non-virgin bride where the marriage is annulled, which Jesus agreed. The price of adultery was not divorce, but death.

·         A Christian scholar who has a video that gives a great explanation about the absolute no divorce and remarriage. He outline great points how to chose a wife wisely or live chastity. He outlined that many Christian singles who are considered by the society as singles, but they are divorce and their first spouse is still alive. He highlight that once is saved does not mean that now is saved or seems sincere. He highlight that the most important valuable one has is to reach heaven and nothing worth to exchange for one's salvation. 

·           Pastor John Piper answering a question of a woman who's husband deserted her and married another whether she can remarry?  His answer was honest and he explained that he has children and if the case happened to them he would be condemned like them if gives the wrong advice. He emphasized that his advice may not be popular, but it is the correct and safest one. He also had a strong message to all church leaders that to tell the truth. It is a forever covenant.  

·         Pastor John Piper also has great sermon about "Covenant Keepers" that marriage is not about any passion or desire or temptation, but once in a lifetime permanent Covenant. Marriage is an oath that can not be broken:

·         http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OMyNWVdDjPE&feature=related Pastor John Piper video Part 1

·         http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nd3AmKexugM&feature=related Pastor John Piper video that marriage is not the center and the point in itself, but it is pointing to something of magnificent.

·         http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jLRue4nwJaA&feature=related This is a related video from Pastor John Piper talking about "Why he abominate the Prosperity Bible." He points that riches are not a blessing usually, but destroyed by it. I point to this video, because in my books I found that hunger for richness entices adultery, which is the worst sin and can easily lead to divorce and so many problems. Worse, it blinds the person so not to view adultery as terrible, because they found it financially rewarding.

·         Divorce and Remarriage -- Why Didn't We See This Before? This is an excellent Biblical research on the error of remarriage written by Myron Horst. The author has many great points. The author pointed that. "When Jesus said, 'whosoever shall marry her that is divorced committeth adultery' (Matt. 5:32; Matt. 19:9) He said something significant that I did not see for a long time. When Jesus made that statement, He was stating that divorce does not end the first marriage. People have always assumed that divorce ends the first marriage, but Jesus said that it is not true. The sin of adultery can only occur if one or both of the persons involved is married." The author valid point is that divorce does not end a person's first marriage, or erase adultery or make remarriage legible; otherwise, Christ would not indicate it as living in continuation of adultery. Another point the author discussed is that God divorced Israel, but is known that the husband who divorces his wife can not take her back again. However, God returned back Israel to him as stated in Jer 3:1-8 implying that divorce does not end a first marriage or sanction to remarry, because the separated spouse is still married to the first spouse. The author discussed other Biblical places where divorce does not end a first marriage. Further, he discusses that spouses should not take one another to legal courts, but to the saints as stated in 1Cor. 6:1-11. The author noted that, "The first major change in the NIV is the incorrect twisting of the "translation" of the Greek word pornea as "marital unfaithfulness" as well as other inaccuracies. By twisting the meaning of pornea, the NIV opens wide the gate for divorce and remarriage in every divorce situation." The author point that divorce takes family matters to court rather than to God and relying on Him as the best helper and judger of all. It undermines the power of God to intervene and removes people from fellowship with the Creator. The author points that it does not make a difference when the divorce sin is committed either before or after one becomes a Christian. The author points that grace does not stop remarriage from being a sin as supported in Jeremiah 7: 9-10, Romans 6:1-2, Romans 6:15 and that Jesus after forgave the woman caught in adultery commanded her to sin no more. The author points that Christ responded to the Pharisees as he would to everyone divorcing today that "hardened of your heart."  and hardness of hearts does not make the divorce and remarriage right. The author discusses how the culture at the time of Jesus was similar to today and had influence on the Jewish culture as indicated in Acts. The author reports, "attempt many activities that had been for men only, and to make full use of the law to end unhappy marriages and contract new ones. They practiced birth control and abortion, formed freely chosen amorous bonds, lived outside of matrimony, and enjoyed a new liberty that had been absolutely unthinkable- sexual freedom" The author discusses that having children in the second marriage does not end a previous valid marriage and the spouses responsibility to the first legitimate vow covenant. The author conclude that a remarried couple needs to be separated, because it is wrong for a spouse to care for an illegitimate spouse while their legitimate spouse is alive. The author encourages not to marry a divorced person who has a legitimate living spouse, because the relationship even if they love one another is adultery.

·         ADDRESS OF THE PEERS OF ENGLAND TO POPE CLEMENT VII ASKING FOR THE ANNULMENT OF KING HENRY VIII’S MARRIAGE [ex Anglia], 1530 July 13^th. The Vatican released the letter from the Peers of England on behalf of King Henry VIII requesting his marriage to be declared null so he can be permitted to remarry Anne Boleyn. The Pope rejected King Henry's request declaring the marriage bond is indissoluble. However, King Henry carried his plan and got married and broke the Anglican Church of England from Rome.

·         ^{In January, 29, 2010 Pope Benedict XVI stated that,} "Granting easy access to marriage annulments is an offense against both justice and charity."

·         ^{Sheila Kennedy speaks how she waited for 10 years} to learn that the initial annulment that was granted of her marriage from her husband Joseph Kennedy was reversed. Although her marriage was divorced by the Civil court and initially granted an annulment from the Catholic Tribunal in the U.S.A.; however, mistakes could happen in declaring any marriage is not valid when it is valid. Anyone who is divorced may cohabitate with another person, enjoy dating and fooling around, remarry, divorce and have additional children, but ultimately after all the pain they caused to the children, other spouses, their own spouse, family and society may be dishonoring their valid spouse and the Creator and permanently blocking the reconciliation with their valid spouse. While a person may not be able to undue damages, but everyone can stop inflicting further damages. Every relationship outside a valid marriage is severe damage that can never be justified no matter what are the excuses or rational or anyone declares their legitimacy. Every such relationship is pouring gas in cooperation with the accomplices on a house with own family burning inside. Rather than excusing and rationalizing adding more gas and inviting others to help you burn your own family, ask yourself when will you stop and feel remorse? While the Catholic Church reversed the decree of nullity declaring the indissolubility of the original marriage, the civil courts seldom would reverse a divorce or shows interest in proper evaluation whether the marriage should be divorced.

·         A study on divorce and remarriage in the church by Jim Drago. The author concluded that, "The only time a second marriage is not adultery and can be considered a covenant marriage is if neither partner has a living, covenant (first marriage) spouse. If either does, they are living in an ongoing state of adultery. I might add here that dead, means dead. It does not mean that in your opinion they are dead in their sin. Who are you to judge? It does not mean that they are dead in your heart. It means no longer alive."

• Please, note that no payment is required or necessary for The Ultimate Goal of Life and The Ultimate Good and Bad books, except only if you insist to donate.

        

• You can help our message spread by Email your Friends and families and encourage them to read The Ultimate Goal Of Life™ book and The Ultimate Good and Bad™ book.

• Parents should teach, encourage, and support their children at early age about the message discussed in the books. In the area of sexuality, I believe it takes one mistake to scar an individual and alter the course of their lives. Repentance is always an option, but overcoming sexual addition is a lifelong challenge that become challenger.

• You can email us with your suggestions, thought and feedback. It is always great to have a logical discussion for the benefit of all.

• Shop for any of the products you like that are offered for sale on this site are part of my labor to pay for my expenses. Most of the products are in the area of natural health. However, health, longevity, financial prosperity, sexual happiness, popularity, achievement and success are not my seek and desire. I continue faithfully to labor, but my primary goal is to abide by the Creator design and to achieve what out culture treasures and encourages as worthy, envy and deserving.

The journey to understand what is the ultimate goal of life and its design's purpose and the commitment to abide by it would require encouragements. Spiritual growth can thrive with nurturing. Reading the Holy Scripture and meditating on its messages is a perfect source for enrichment. I also find the thoughts, books and explanations contributed by like-minded others are precious. Bellow are some of my favorite readings:

• His Way Center for Spiritual growth founded by Fr. David Knight. I met Fr David about 25 years ago when I attended his speech on college campus. I love his knowledge, humbleness and message. I personally have most of his books and have read them many times. Fr. Knight has a special spiritual depth that is wonderful. I would encourage you to read some of his books. His book His Way, is a good book for starters. His book The Good News about Sex is among my favorite books. His explanation of the marital conjugate love somewhat similar to Christ on the Cross mixed with pain and passion is an astonishing analogy and one of my utmost admiration of his writings. Then 25 years later, after I wrote the Books The Ultimate Goal of Life and The Ultimate Good and Bad, I reached a deeper understanding of that analogy by Fr. Knight. In case you wonder, Fr. Knight has not read any of my books.

Shop for any of the products you like that are offered for sale on this site are part of my labor to pay for my expenses. Most of the products are in the area of natural health. However, health, longevity, financial prosperity, sexual happiness, popularity, achievement and success are not my seek and desire. I continue faithfully to labor, but my primary goal is to abide by the Creator design and to achieve what out culture treasures and encourages as worthy, envy and deserving

Shop for any of the products you like that are offered for sale on this site are part of my labor to pay for my expenses. Most of the products are in the area of natural health. However, health, longevity, financial prosperity, sexual happiness, popularity, achievement and success are not my seek and desire. I continue faithfully to labor, but my primary goal is to abide by the Creator design and to achieve what out culture treasures and encourages as worthy, envy and deserving

For this site visitors, bellow is a coupon that you can use during the checkout process for a discount. you need to type the code in the appropriate section during the checkout process.

Angelia juicer made by Angel Juicer Company in South Korea. It is a wonderful machine. It makes you taste the nutritional goodness that our Creator gifted us in a delicious nutritious drink.

Thumper Massager Maxi pro is an excellent product that I use and recommend made in Canada. Due to prolonged sitting behind a pc and less active lifestyle, we tend to suffer from back, shoulder and neck pain. Pain medication prescriptions and the increase in their addition is huge in the Western world. This is a good massager to have on hand and use when needed or daily as a preventative measure. I like the Maxi pro. I also see some advantages for having the Mini Pro to reach the back area at ease.

TTMatic 505B or one of their table tennis robot is great to kill boredom and loneliness rather than acting out on temptations by addictive ways as the culture and the tyranny of businesses promote and encourage as healthy, normal and therapeutic. I like table tennis and the use of a robot, because one can do it at any time regardless of the whether outside. The TTMatic top of the line robot is built to last and very entertaining. But one needs to purchase a table tennis first and make room at home to enjoy the sport. Table tennis is a great sport that is fun and addictive and with the TTMatic robot one can play alone or with others. It is a popular sport that can be enjoyed all life. The problem with a cheaper robot brands is that usually players would use them for few weeks before retiring them. Therefore, one should either purchase the cheapest robot or invest in a top of the line robot. I believe that the TTMatic meets any needs and would be used for many years without the need to upgrade for a newer model.

Sportsman 1502 Digital professional eggs hatching incubator made by GQF Company is a great product for small farms or home owners that can raise poultry. It is very well made and easy to operate. Fr. David Knight once wrote, "If the one who welcomes you has paws and tail, do something special to thank your pet for being there." We hatched chicken in our GQF sportsman 1502 incubator and was a great experience. We enjoy chickens in our backyard. They enjoy our left-over especially pulp from juicing. I particularly enjoy the roaster's early morning wakeup call. Our chicken turned out a lot of fun. One chicken insists on jumping on sleeping on the window edge of the room we sit in. The only way we get her to sleep in her home is to tuck-her in everyday carrying her and setting her on a branch we have in their home. Then in the morning, she remains sitting on the branch calling until we carry her down. Yes, the branch is much lower than the height of the window that she has no trouble flying there. We love fresh chicken eggs. 

Purity ball, abstinence, chastity, fidelity and fidelity are great promise. It is important to raise pure offspring and society. It is important for both girls and boys. It is equally important that the commitment does not stop with marriage, but to be supported throughout their life, thus to avoid promiscuity, cheating during marriage as well. I believe a promise although important, but reality shows us the need for solid belief and conviction. Marriage is the ultimate promise above any other human promises put together. However, divorces and cheating proved that promises have lost their values with today's mentality that value pleasure, wealth, sexy and fun above human promises. Thus, today's numb society requires ongoing teaching and support.